The Nagpur bench of the Bombay Excessive Courtroom has dominated that holding the fingers of a minor lady and opening the zip of pants doesn’t fall below the purview of ‘sexual assault’ or ‘aggravated sexual assault’ of the Safety of Kids from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
The commentary was made by a single bench of Justice Pushpa Ganediwala on January 15 whereas passing an order on an attraction filed by a 50-year-old man difficult a periods court docket’s order convicting him for sexually assaulting and molesting a five-year-old lady.
The convict, Libnus Kujur, was in October 2020 convicted below sections 354-A (1)(i) (outraging modesty) and 448 (house-trespass) of the IPC and sections 8 (sexual assault), 10 (aggravated sexual assault) and 12 (sexual harassment) of the POCSO Act. He was sentenced to 5 years in jail.
In her judgement, Justice Ganediwala famous that whereas the prosecution has established that the accused entered the home of the lady with an intention to outrage her modesty or sexually harass her, it has not been in a position to show the cost of ‘sexual assault’ or ‘aggravated sexual assault’.
The excessive court docket famous that the definition of “sexual assault” below the POCSO Act says that there must be “bodily contact with sexual intent with out penetration”.
“The acts of ‘holding the fingers of the prosecutrix (sufferer)’, or ‘opened zip of the pant’ as has been allegedly witnessed by the prosecution witness (mom of the lady), within the opinion of this court docket, doesn’t match within the definition of ‘sexual assault’,” Justice Ganediwala mentioned.
The excessive court docket additional mentioned that the information of the current case are usually not adequate to repair the legal legal responsibility on the accused (Kujur) for the alleged offence of aggravated sexual assault.
“On the most, the minor offence punishable below part 354-A(1)(i) of the IPC learn with part 12 of the POCSO Act is proved in opposition to the appellant (Kujur),” the court docket mentioned.
The prosecution’s case is that Kujur had on February 12, 2018 entered the home of the sufferer when her mom had gone to work.
When the mom returned from work, she discovered the accused holding the hand of her daughter with the zip of his pants open.
The mom, whereas recording her proof within the decrease court docket, had mentioned that her daughter had knowledgeable her that the accused individual had eliminated his personal half from the pant and requested the sufferer to return to mattress for sleeping.
The excessive court docket ended Kujur’s conviction below sections 8 and 10 of POCSO Act, however upheld his conviction below the opposite sections.
The court docket, nevertheless, mentioned it was modifying the sentence and famous that Kujur has to date undergone 5 months in jail.
“Contemplating the character of the act, which might be established by the prosecution and contemplating the punishment offered for the aforesaid crimes, within the opinion of this Courtroom, the imprisonment which he has already undergone would serve the aim,” the court docket mentioned.
The court docket mentioned the accused shall be let loose if he isn’t required in some other case.
One other judgment handed by Justice Ganediwala this month acquitting a 39-year-old man for groping a minor lady, noting that there was no “skin-to-skin contact with sexual intent” has confronted extreme flak.
The Supreme Courtroom had on Wednesday stayed operation of this order after Lawyer Basic KK Venugopal talked about the matter submitting that it was a really disturbing conclusion by the Bombay Excessive Courtroom.
(Apart from the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV employees and is printed from a syndicated feed.)