If There’s No Regulatory Mechanism For TV, Create One

| |

The Solicitor Common instructed the courtroom {that a} contemporary affidavit will probably be filed.

New Delhi:

The federal government is silent on the motion taken towards TV channels in a case linked to media reporting on the Tablighi Jamaat gathering at a Delhi mosque in violation of virus restrictions, the Supreme Courtroom mentioned in the present day, stressing on the necessity of a “regulatory mechanism”.

“The federal government is silent on the motion that has been taken and the facility it has to manage the TV channels. If there isn’t a regulatory mechanism, create one or else we’ll hand it over to outdoors company. Regulation can’t be left to the NBSA (Information Broadcasters Requirements Authority)” Chief Justice SA Bobde mentioned in the present day, including that the highest courtroom just isn’t glad with the centre’s affidavit which was shared within the high courtroom, the second in the previous few weeks.

In the present day’s listening to got here practically a month after the highest courtroom berated the federal government for having a junior officer file what it known as an “extraordinarily offensive and brazen” response.

“First, you didn’t file a correct affidavit and then you definitely filed an affidavit which didn’t cope with the 2 vital questions. This fashion it can’t be accomplished Mr Mehta… we’re not glad together with your reply. We requested you to inform about what motion taken has been taken. However not a whisper in your affidavit,” the bench headed by Chief Justice SA Bobde instructed Solicitor Common Tushar Mehta, underlining that the federal government didn’t cope with the Cable TV Community Act in its response because it highlighted that “applicability of the Act in controlling media has an awesome consequence on this nation”. 

“Inform us what is the current authorized regime you have got… you have not instructed something,” the highest courtroom mentioned. The Solicitor Common instructed the courtroom {that a} contemporary affidavit will probably be filed.

The centre has defended the media on this case and mentioned in its response to the Supreme Courtroom that there was “no occasion of unhealthy reporting”.

The Supreme Courtroom final month pulled up the centre on its affidavit and mentioned it “should inform us situations of unhealthy reporting” and what motion had been taken. “Freedom of speech is without doubt one of the most abused freedoms in current occasions,” Chief Justice SA Bobde had mentioned through the listening to final month.


The highest courtroom has been listening to petitions for motion towards the media for “spreading hatred” over the Tablighi meet at Markaz Nizamuddin earlier this yr. 

The assembly in March generated an enormous controversy because it grew to become a coronavirus super-spreader with many instances throughout the nation linked to those that had attended the gathering.

The federal government has instructed the courtroom that it has blocked over 740 hyperlinks on Fb, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube, which linked the unfold of coronavirus with faith. 

Final month, the federal government was requested to file one other affidavit by the Secretary of the Data and Broadcasting Ministry, on the petition in search of motion towards some TV channels. 

“You can not deal with this courtroom the way in which you’re treating it. Some junior officer has filed the affidavit. Your affidavit is evasive and says petitioner reveals no occasion of unhealthy reporting. Chances are you’ll not agree however how one can say there isn’t a occasion of unhealthy reporting proven,” the Chief Justice had questioned.

The highest courtroom will once more take up the case after three weeks. 


Padma Shri Awardee Journalist Quits Editors Guild of India Over “Complete Silence” In Case Against Her

Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Offers Possible Antidote For Deep-Freeze Problem


Leave a Comment