Sushant Singh Rajput’s Face Revealed He Was Innocent, Sober: Bombay High Court

| |

Sushant Singh Rajput's Face Revealed He Was Innocent, Sober: Bombay High Court

Sushant Singh Rajput, 34, was discovered lifeless in his suburban residence on June 14, 2020.


The Bombay Excessive Courtroom on Thursday praised late actor Sushant Singh Rajput’s work within the movie “MS Dhoni: The Untold Story” and stated that one may make out from the actor”s face that he was an excellent human being.

The remarks have been made by a bench of Justices S S Shinde and M S Karnik whereas reserving its verdict on a petition filed by Sushant Singh Rajput’s sisters – Priyanka Singh and Meetu Singh- looking for to quash an FIR for alleged forgery and fabrication of a medical prescription for his or her brother.

“Regardless of the case…from Sushant Singh Rajput’s face one may make out that he was harmless and sober…and an excellent human being,” Justice Shinde stated.

“Everyone appreciated him particularly in that M S Dhoni movie,” the decide added.

The FIR was lodged towards Priyanka Singh, Meetu Singh and physician Tarun Kumar of Delhi’s Ram Manohar Lohia hospital by the suburban Bandra police on September 7 based mostly on a criticism by Sushant Singh Rajput’s girlfriend Rhea Chakraborty.

As per the criticism, the sisters and the physician ready a cast and fabricated prescription for anti-depressants for his or her brother.

Sushant Singh Rajput, 34, was discovered lifeless in his suburban residence on June 14, 2020.

His father KK Singh later lodged a case of abetment of suicide and dishonest towards Chakraborty and her members of the family.

The case is being probed by the CBI.

The Bandra police, after registration of the FIR towards Sushant Singh Rajput’s sisters, forwarded the case papers to the CBI as per the instructions from the Supreme Courtroom, which had stated that each one circumstances pertaining to the demise of Sushant Singh Rajput shall be probed by the CBI.

On Thursday, senior counsel Vikas Singh, showing on behalf of the sisters, argued that the Telemedicine Apply pointers permitted a health care provider to prescribe medicines after a web based session.

He added that as a result of COVID-19 pandemic, Sushant Singh Rajput could not go for a bodily session. Singh added that even assuming that such a prescription was procured, there was no proof to point out that Sushant Singh Rajput consumed any medicines.


Senior counsel Devdutt Kamat, showing for the Mumbai police, nonetheless, claimed that no on-line session was finished on this case.

He stated that the WhatsApp chat between Sushant Singh Rajput and his sister from June 8, 2020, clearly reveals that Priyanka Singh procured the prescription with none session between the physician and the affected person.

“The police has proof to point out that an unidentified man went to the OPD of the Ram Manohar Lohia hospital on June 8, 2020, and took a token and later a prescription from the accused physician Tarun Kumar,” Kamat stated.

He added that as per the authorized provisions, the Mumbai police registered FIR after receiving a criticism and forwarded the identical to the CBI.

Advocate Satish Maneshinde, showing for Chakraborty, sought dismissal of the petition and stated that one of many circumstances which will have led to Sushant Singh Rajput’s demise was the “harmful cocktail of medication and narcotic substances and medicines”.

“Sushant Singh Rajput was beneath Rhea’s take care of 14 months earlier than June 8, 2020 when he requested her to go away the home. Throughout that interval, Rhea ensured that Sushant Singh Rajput took his medicines and by no means blended them with medicine,” Maneshinde stated.

“Sushant Singh Rajput’s cook dinner and servant on June 8, 2020, noticed the actor roll 4 joints (medicine) and preserve it in a field. On June 14, when the actor was discovered lifeless in his room, the field was empty. This has been knowledgeable by the servant to the authorities,” he stated.

Maneshinde added that the CBI ought to probe the case and if it involves the conclusion that there is no such thing as a case, then it might file a closure report.

“The complainant then has the choice to file a protest petition. Quashing the FIR at this stage could be untimely,” he instructed the courtroom.

The bench directed the attorneys to submit their written submissions and reserved its order. 


Second Covid Vaccination Dry Run Across Country Today: 10 Points

AUS vs IND, 3rd Test: Rishabh Pant Gets Trolled After Dropping Two Catches


Leave a Comment